Hi All,

I wanted to know the approach has been followed for LBaaS implementation in 
Openstack (juno) out of the following in the 
link(https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-lbaas-api-proposals). Is it-
Existing Core Resource Model
LoadBalancer Instance Model
Vip-Centric Model
Currently I find Pool as the root object that has a VIP associated with it 
rather than Listeners and LoadBalancers in various openstack documents.

But while investigating the same, I came across a blueprint 
(https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/lbaas-api-and-objmodel-improvement)
 for LBaaS Api and object model improvement. It talks about moving the current 
VIP object to Listener and Listener will be linked to a LoadBalancer in the 
upcoming releases,

I wanted to know the current approach followed for openstack-juno and if in the 
upcoming releases(Kilo)-
 Are we planning to have new APIs for /Listener and /Loader and there will be 
no VIP object and its corresponding API.
 Or we will be having VIP object and its corresponding API, creation of which 
will result in creation of Loadbalancer and /Listener at the backend itself.
If you find the above investigation incorrect, please feel free to point to the 
right direction.


Thanks & Regards
Shreshtha Joshi
=====-----=====-----=====
Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
message and/or attachments to it may contain 
confidential or privileged information. If you are 
not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, 
review, distribution, printing or copying of the 
information contained in this e-mail message 
and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If 
you have received this communication in error, 
please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and 
immediately and permanently delete the message 
and any attachments. Thank you


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to