This means whatever tools the operators are using, it need to make sure the IP address assigned inside the VM matches with Openstack has assigned to the port.Bringing the question that i had in another thread on the same topic: If one wants to use the provider DHCP server and not have Openstack's DHCP or L3 agent/DVR, it may not be possible to do so even with DHCP disabled in Openstack network. Even if the provider DHCP server is configured with the same start/end range in the same subnet, there's no guarantee that it will match with Openstack assigned IP address for bulk VM launches or when there's a failure case.So, how does one deploy external DHCP with Openstack? If Openstack hasn't assigned a IP address when DHCP is disabled for a network, can't port_update be done with the provider DHCP specified IP address to put the anti-spoofing and security rules?With Openstack assigned IP address, port_update cannot be done since IP address aren't in sync and can overlap. Thanks,Paddu
On 12/16/14 4:30 AM, "Pasquale Porreca" <pasquale.porr...@dektech.com.au> wrote: >I understood and I agree that assigning the ip address to the port is >not a bug, however showing it to the user, at least in Horizon dashboard >where it pops up in the main instance screen without a specific search, >can be very confusing. > >On 12/16/14 12:25, Salvatore Orlando wrote: >> In Neutron IP address management and distribution are separated >>concepts. >> IP addresses are assigned to ports even when DHCP is disabled. That IP >> address is indeed used to configure anti-spoofing rules and security >>groups. >> >> It is however understandable that one wonders why an IP address is >>assigned >> to a port if there is no DHCP server to communicate that address. >>Operators >> might decide to use different tools to ensure the IP address is then >> assigned to the instance's ports. On XenServer for instance one could >>use a >> guest agent reading network configuration from XenStore; as another >> example, older versions of Openstack used to inject network >>configuration >> into the instance file system; I reckon that today's configdrive might >>also >> be used to configure instance's networking. >> >> Summarising I don't think this is a bug. Nevertheless if you have any >>idea >> regarding improvements on the API UX feel free to file a bug report. >> >> Salvatore >> >> On 16 December 2014 at 10:41, Pasquale Porreca < >> pasquale.porr...@dektech.com.au> wrote: >>> >>> Is there a specific reason for which a fixed ip is bound to a port on a >>> subnet where dhcp is disabled? it is confusing to have this info shown >>> when the instance doesn't have actually an ip on that port. >>> Should I fill a bug report, or is this a wanted behavior? >>> >>> -- >>> Pasquale Porreca >>> >>> DEK Technologies >>> Via dei Castelli Romani, 22 >>> 00040 Pomezia (Roma) >>> >>> Mobile +39 3394823805 >>> Skype paskporr >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > >-- >Pasquale Porreca > >DEK Technologies >Via dei Castelli Romani, 22 >00040 Pomezia (Roma) > >Mobile +39 3394823805 >Skype paskporr > >_______________________________________________ >OpenStack-dev mailing list >OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
