thanks! I have submitted a new blueprint(quota-instance-memory) the link is: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/quota-instance-memory Merry Christmas!^_^
-- Name : Li zheming Company : Hua Wei Address : Shenzhen China Tel:0086 18665391827 At 2014-12-22 22:32:52,"Jay Pipes" <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote: >On 12/22/2014 04:54 AM, li-zheming wrote: >> hi all: Bp >> flavor-quota-memory(https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/flavor-quota-memory) >> was submitted by my partner in havana. but it has abandoned because >> of some reason. > >Some reason == the submitter failed to provide any details on how the >work would be implemented, what the use cases were, and any alternatives >that might be possible. > > > I want to continue to this blueprint. Based on the >> rules about BP for >> <https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack/?searchtext=for> kilo, >> for this bp, spec is not necessary, so I submit the code directly and >> give commit message to clear out questions in spec. Is it right? how >> can I do? thanks! > >Specs are no longer necessary for smallish features, no. A blueprint is >still necessary on Launchpad, so you should be able to use the abandoned >one you link above -- which, AFAICT, has enough implementation details >about the proposed changes. > >Alternately, if you cannot get the original submitter to remove the spec >link to the old spec review, you can always start a new blueprint and we >can mark that one as obselete. > >I'd like Dan Berrange (cc'd) to review whichever blueprint on Launchpad >you end up using. Please let us know what you do. > >All the best, >-jay > >_______________________________________________ >OpenStack-dev mailing list >OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev