On 1/5/2015 6:07 PM, Joe Cropper wrote:
Prefixing subject with [nova] so folks’ mail rules catch this.
- Joe
On Jan 5, 2015, at 1:47 PM, Kenneth Burger <burg...@us.ibm.com
<mailto:burg...@us.ibm.com>> wrote:
Hi, I am trying to get approval on this nova blueprint,
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/140133/. There was a +2 from
Michael Still ( twice in prior patches ) and a +1 from Jay Bryant from
a cinder perspective. The only changes from the patches receiving
the +2 was related to a directory change of the spec location in the
repository.
Is it still possible to get approval for this blueprint?
Thanks,
Ken Burger
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
<mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
A single +2 does not an approval make, but I don't know if there were
others lined up to approve this before the change and the 12/18 deadline.
We're at a point now where the nova-drivers team is going to get
together this week (if not before the nova meeting on Thursday, during
that meeting) to talk about a exception process plan for k-2. Details
on the outcome of that should be in the ML once determined.
--
Thanks,
Matt Riedemann
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
