John Griffith wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Jay S. Bryant
> <> wrote:
>> All,
>> We have been getting a number of non-security patches proposed to
>> stable/icehouse for Cinder.  The cores were discussing what was ok to put
>> into icehouse at this point in time and couldn't agree as to whether we were
>> at the point of only accepting security changes.
>> Appreciate advice on this topic.
> Hey Jay,
> Thanks for raising this, my understanding was that we were in fact
> security only mode now for Icehouse.  That being said I completely
> forgot that it's been that long already and I let some reviews slip
> myself just today in fact.  Thanks for pointing it out.

Icehouse is now 9-month old, so it is in phase II support ("only
critical bugfixes and security patches are acceptable").


In case of doubt, you can ask stable-maint-core people for advice:,members

Thierry Carrez (ttx)

OpenStack-dev mailing list

Reply via email to