John Griffith wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Jay S. Bryant > <jsbry...@electronicjungle.net> wrote: >> All, >> >> We have been getting a number of non-security patches proposed to >> stable/icehouse for Cinder. The cores were discussing what was ok to put >> into icehouse at this point in time and couldn't agree as to whether we were >> at the point of only accepting security changes. >> >> Appreciate advice on this topic. >> > > Hey Jay, > > Thanks for raising this, my understanding was that we were in fact > security only mode now for Icehouse. That being said I completely > forgot that it's been that long already and I let some reviews slip > myself just today in fact. Thanks for pointing it out.
Icehouse is now 9-month old, so it is in phase II support ("only critical bugfixes and security patches are acceptable"). Reference: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StableBranch#Support_phases In case of doubt, you can ask stable-maint-core people for advice: https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/530,members -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackemail@example.com http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev