Hi everyone, Following the adoption by the Technical Committee of the project structure reform specification, I proposed a number of initial changes on the governance repository.
 http://governance.openstack.org/resolutions/20141202-project-structure-reform-spec.html  https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/governance+branch:master+topic:tag-template,n,z I attract your attention of the 3rd change in this series, which proposes the new, simpler, more objective requirements to place on future entrants in the realm of "OpenStack projects". Everyone has a slightly different idea on the amount and nature of those, so feel free to comment on this thread and/or the review itself.  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/145740/ The current version proposed is a strawman based on the "are you one of us" test that Monty originally proposed on  and the example list that was included in the spec. I expect it to be heavily discussed and to evolve a bit before it's actually voted on and adopted by the Technical Committee.  http://inaugust.com/post/108 So if you have a strong opinion on that, please join the discussion now :) -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackemail@example.com http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev