On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Andrew Beekhof <abeek...@redhat.com> wrote:

>
> > On 9 Dec 2014, at 1:20 am, Roman Dobosz <roman.dob...@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 08:44:57 +0100
> > Roman Dobosz <roman.dob...@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I've just started to work on the topic of detection if host is alive or
> >> not: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/host-health-monitoring
> >>
> >> I'll appreciate any comments :)
> >
> > I've submitted another blueprint, which is closely bounded with previous
> one:
> >
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/pacemaker-servicegroup-driver
> >
> > The idea behind those two blueprints is to enable Nova to be aware of
> host
> > status, not only services that run on such. Bringing Pacemaker as a
> driver for
> > servicegroup will provide us with two things: fencing and reliable
> information
> > about host state, therefore we can avoid situations, where some actions
> will
> > misinterpret information like service state with host state.
> >
> > Comments?
>

I would rather move the servicegroup concept to use tooz and put things
like Pacemaker in there (https://review.openstack.org/138607)


>
> Sounds like an excellent idea, is there code for these blueprints? If so,
> how do I get to see it?
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to