On 01/12/2015 06:35 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 06:28:53PM +0300, Dmitry Guryanov wrote:
On 01/05/2015 02:30 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 05:18:19PM +0300, Dmitry Guryanov wrote:
Hello,

Libvirt can create loop or nbd device for LXC container and mount it by
itself, for instance, you can add something like this to xml config:

<filesystem type='file'>
   <driver type='loop' format='raw'/>
   <source file='/fedora-20-raw'/>
   <target dir='/'/>
</filesystem>

But nova mounts filesystem for container by itself. Is this because rhel-6
doesn't support filesystems with type='file' or there are some other reasons?
The support for mounting using NBD in OpenStack pre-dated the support
for doing this in Libvirt. In faact the reason I added this feature to
libvirt was precisely because OpenStack was doing this.

We haven't switched Nova over to use this new syntax yet though, because
that would imply a change to the min required libvirt version for LXC.
That said we should probably make such a change, because honestly no
one should be using LXC without using user namespaces, othewise their
cloud is horribly insecure. This would imply making the min libvirt for
LXC much much newer than it is today.

It's not very hard to replace mounting in nova with generating proper xml
config. Can we do it before kilo release? Are there any people, who use
openstack with LXC in production?
Looking at libvirt history, it would mean we mandate 1.0.6 as the min
libvirt for use with the LXC driver.

Regards,
Daniel

I've created RFC patches:

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147535/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147534/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/147533/


--
Dmitry Guryanov


__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to