+1

On 15 January 2015 at 14:46, Edgar Magana <edgar.mag...@workday.com> wrote:

>  +1 For adding Doug as Core in Neutron!
>
>  I have seen his work on the services part and he is a great member of
> the OpenStack community!
>
>  Edgar
>
>   From: Kyle Mestery <mest...@mestery.com>
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Date: Thursday, January 15, 2015 at 2:31 PM
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Changes to the core team
>
>    The last time we looked at core reviewer stats was in December [1]. In
> looking at the current stats, I'm going to propose some changes to the core
> team. Reviews are the most important part of being a core reviewer, so we
> need to ensure cores are doing reviews. The stats for the 90 day period [2]
> indicate some changes are needed for core reviewers who are no longer
> reviewing on pace with the other core reviewers.
>
>  First of all, I'm removing Sumit Naiksatam from neutron-core. Sumit has
> been a core reviewer for a long time, and his past contributions are very
> much thanked by the entire OpenStack Neutron team. If Sumit jumps back in
> with thoughtful reviews in the future, we can look at getting him back as a
> Neutron core reviewer. But for now, his stats indicate he's not reviewing
> at a level consistent with the rest of the Neutron core reviewers.
>
>  As part of the change, I'd like to propose Doug Wiegley as a new Neutron
> core reviewer. Doug has been actively reviewing code across not only all
> the Neutron projects, but also other projects such as infra. His help and
> work in the services split in December were the reason we were so
> successful in making that happen. Doug has also been instrumental in the
> Neutron LBaaS V2 rollout, as well as helping to merge code in the other
> neutron service repositories.
>
> I'd also like to take this time to remind everyone that reviewing code is
> a responsibility, in Neutron the same as other projects. And core reviewers
> are especially beholden to this responsibility. I'd also like to point out
> that +1/-1 reviews are very useful, and I encourage everyone to continue
> reviewing code even if you are not a core reviewer.
>
> Existing neutron cores, please vote +1/-1 for the addition of Doug to the
> core team.
>
> Thanks!
> Kyle
>
> [1]
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-December/051986.html
> [2] http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/neutron-reviewers-90.txt
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to