On 26/01/15 10:49, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote: > On 01/26/2015 11:00 AM, Julie Pichon wrote: >> On 26/01/15 06:34, A mailing list for the OpenStack Stable Branch test >> reports. wrote: >>> Build failed. >>> >>> - periodic-horizon-docs-icehouse >>> http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stableperiodic-horizon-docs-icehouse/9382030/ >>> : SUCCESS in 4m 14s >>> - periodic-horizon-python26-icehouse >>> http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stableperiodic-horizon-python26-icehouse/b39cce4/ >>> : FAILURE in 2m 53s >>> - periodic-horizon-python27-icehouse >>> http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stableperiodic-horizon-python27-icehouse/2381739/ >>> : FAILURE in 3m 09s >>> - periodic-horizon-docs-juno >>> http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stableperiodic-horizon-docs-juno/3e9efb0/ >>> : SUCCESS in 5m 01s >>> - periodic-horizon-python26-juno >>> http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stableperiodic-horizon-python26-juno/efc60ca/ >>> : FAILURE in 3m 19s >>> - periodic-horizon-python27-juno >>> http://logs.openstack.org/periodic-stableperiodic-horizon-python27-juno/59627d3/ >>> : FAILURE in 2m 22s >> This is being debugged at >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1413876 , the patch for >> django_openstack_auth is merging. Once a new version of the library is >> released that includes the fix, this should resolve the problem on all >> branches without the need for backports. > > > Should we also update openstack/requirements for all branches not to > pick the failing version of the library?
There was a brief discussion about setting an upper limit pin, but a "negative" version pin to avoid the broken release would be a lot cleaner indeed. I'll prepare the patches. Thanks! Julie __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev