The suggestion of whether to use 1 or 2 repos for the API WG surfaced on the ML 
here [1]. That thread then morphed into a discussion on whether to use 1 or 2 
repos. I believe it’s correct to say that the consensus on that thread was for 
1 repo.

We also discussed the question of 1 or 2 repos during the API WG meeting [2] 
and, of the 7 attendees that voted, there was unanimous agreement [3] for 1 
repo.

Unless there’s a strong objection or disagreement with my analysis of the 
above, the API WG will move forward and use only 1 repo.

Now the question becomes, which repo?

Everett

[1] 
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/api_wg/2015/api_wg.2015-01-29-16.00.html
[2] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-January/055524.html
[3] 
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/api_wg/2015/api_wg.2015-01-29-16.00.log.html#l-67


__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to