On 2015-02-03 22:12:09 -0500 (-0500), Jay Pipes wrote: > On 01/27/2015 01:15 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: [...] > > I agree with your statement that summary reference metadata is > > useful. I agree with Doug that it is inappropriate for the TC to > > assign it. [...] > Originally, I proposed that the tag data be managed by the > project-config-core team in much the same way that new > Gerrit/Jeepyb project applications are handled.
For the same reasons that the TC is uncomfortable making these decisions about what tags to assign to what repos I am uncomfortable, as part of the Infra team e.g. "project-config-core" in Gerrit, being the decision making body on whether a repo contains "production ready" software, has sufficient testing, is thoroughly documented, is security-audited and keeps up with their vulnerability reports, et cetera. Acting as a gatekeeper and proxy for the actual stakeholders (User Committee/Operators, QA team, Docs team, VMT/OSSG, and so on) is probably okay but does sound a bit tedious. -- Jeremy Stanley
Description: Digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev