----- Original Message -----
> From: "Anthony Veiga" <[email protected]>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
> <[email protected]>
> 
> > On Feb 6, 2015, at 8:17 , Jeremy Stanley <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > On 2015-02-06 12:11:40 +0100 (+0100), Marc Koderer wrote:
> > [...]
> >> Therefore I uploaded one of them (Session Border Controller) to
> >> the Gerrit system into the sandbox repo:
> >> 
> >>    https://review.openstack.org/#/c/152940/1
> > [...]
> > 
> > This looks a lot like the beginnings of a specification which has
> > implications for multiple OpenStack projects. Would proposing a
> > cross-project spec in the openstack/openstack-specs repository be an
> > appropriate alternative?\
> 
> It does look like that.  However, the intent here is to allow non-developer
> members of a Telco provide the use cases they need to accomplish. This way
> the Telco WG can identify gaps and file a proper spec into each of the
> OpenStack projects.

Indeed, what we're trying to do is help the non-developer members of the group 
articulate their use cases and tease them out to a level that is meaningful to 
someone who is not immersed in telecommunications themselves. In this way we 
hope to in turn be able to create meaningful specifications for the actual 
OpenStack projects impacted.

It's possible that some of these will be truly cross-project and therefore head 
to openstack-specs but initial indications seem to be that most will either be 
specific to a project, or cross only a couple of projects (e.g. nova and 
neutron) - I am sure someone will come up with some more exceptions to this 
statement to prove me wrong :).

Thanks,

Steve

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to