On 02/24/2015 01:28 PM, Kashyap Chamarthy wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:54:31AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:48:29AM +0000, Chris Dent wrote:
>>> On Tue, 24 Feb 2015, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>>>> need to do more work. If this is so, then I don't think this is a blocker,
>>>> it is just a sign that the project needs to focus on providing more 
>>>> resources
>>>> to the teams impacted in that way.
>>> What are the mechanisms whereby the project provides more resources
>>> to teams?
> Along with the below, if push comes to shove, OpenStack Foundation could
> probably try a milder variant (obviously, not all activities can be
> categorized as 'critical path') of Linux Foundation's "Critical
> Infrastructure Protection Initiative"[1] to fund certain project
> activities in need.

The OpenStack Foundation effectively already does this.  In particular,
the Foundation is helping fund critical horizontal efforts like release
management, infrastructure, and community management.

Russell Bryant

OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Reply via email to