> On Mar 3, 2015, at 1:06 PM, Kevin Benton <blak...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It might make sense to send this to the users list as well. There may be a 
> large deployment out there with resources willing to at least test changes 
> even if they don't have any upstream development resources.

Good call, I’ve cross-posted to the user list as you suggest.

> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Maru Newby <ma...@redhat.com> wrote:
> There have been a couple of patches [1] [2] proposed to neutron recently that 
> could impact our support for Xen+OVS, but I don’t see an easy way for us to 
> validate such changes.  I’m not aware of a 3rd party CI job that runs against 
> Xen, and I don’t know of any active contributors able to manually validate 
> changes.  Unless this changes, I think we should consider deprecating support 
> for Xen in kilo.  We can’t afford to block changes for fear of breaking 
> something that nobody seems to care about.
> I’m hoping this post serves as a wake-up call to anyone that wants to see 
> neutron maintain its support for Xen, and that they will be willing to devote 
> resources to ensure that support for it continues.  I’ve also added this 
> issue to next week’s irc meeting [3].
> Maru
> 1: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/148969/
> 2: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/158805
> 3: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/Meetings#On_Demand_Agenda

OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Reply via email to