> From: Nikhil Komawar [mailto:nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 4:10 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Daniel P. > Berrange > Cc: krag...@gmail.com > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations. > > If it was not clear in my previous message, I would like to again emphasize > that I truly appreciate the vigor and intent behind Flavio's proposal. We > need to be proactive and keep making the community better in such regards. > > However, at the same time we need to act fairly, with patience and have a > friendly strategy for doing the same (thus maintaining a good balance in our > progress). I should probably respond to another thread on ML mentioning my > opinion that the community's success depends on "trust" and "empathy" and > everyone's intent as well as effort in maintaining these principles. Without > them, it will not take very long to make the situation chaotic.
<snip> > Hence, I think coming with a good plan during the feature freeze period > including when and how are we going to implement it, when would be a final > draft of cores to be rotated be published, etc. questions would be answered > with _patience_ and input from other cores. We would have a plan in K so, > that WOULD be a step forward as discussed in the beginning and be implemented > in L, ensuring out empathetic stand. > The essence of the matter is: > We need to change the dynamics slowly and with patience for maintaining a > good balance. Based on the above I must vote -- for adding 4 new cores without doing the housekeeping. To maintain good balance one needs to achieve that first and I do not see how the proposal is slow and patient towards that goal. - Erno > Best, > -Nikhil __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev