> From: Nikhil Komawar [mailto:nikhil.koma...@rackspace.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 4:10 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions); Daniel P. 
> Berrange
> Cc: krag...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Core nominations.
> If it was not clear in my previous message, I would like to again emphasize 
> that I truly appreciate the vigor and intent behind Flavio's proposal. We 
> need to be proactive and keep making the community better in such regards.
> However, at the same time we need to act fairly, with patience and have a 
> friendly strategy for doing the same (thus maintaining a good balance in our 
> progress). I should probably respond to another thread on ML mentioning my 
> opinion that the community's success depends on "trust" and "empathy" and 
> everyone's intent as well as effort in maintaining these principles. Without 
> them, it will not take very long to make the situation chaotic.


> Hence, I think coming with a good plan during the feature freeze period 
> including when and how are we going to implement it, when would be a final 
> draft of cores to be rotated be published, etc. questions would be answered 
> with _patience_ and input from other cores. We would have a plan in K so, 
> that WOULD be a step forward as discussed in the beginning and be implemented 
> in L, ensuring out empathetic stand.  

> The essence of the matter is:
> We need to change the dynamics slowly and with patience for maintaining a 
> good balance.

Based on the above I must vote -- for adding 4 new cores without doing the 
housekeeping. To maintain good balance one needs to achieve that first and I do 
not see how the proposal is slow and patient towards that goal.

- Erno

> Best,
> -Nikhil

OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Reply via email to