Oh, sure - switching to the spec is fine, I didn't realise there was
one, given the list thread had gone quiet :)

-Rob

On 12 March 2015 at 12:24, Ruby Loo <rlooya...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11 March 2015 at 18:21, Robert Collins <robe...@robertcollins.net> wrote:
> ...
>>
>> Since there was no debate on the compat thing, I've thrown up an
>> etherpad to start the discussion.
>>
>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-client-ux
>>
>
> Thanks Rob. Michael Davies has a spec [1] that discusses how a client
> interacts with Ironic (pre-microversion and post-microversion). Maybe
> we can move our discussion to that spec? I was hoping we'd be able to
> decide and implement *something* for the kilo release, but maybe I am
> being overly optimistic.
>
> --ruby
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/161110/
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



-- 
Robert Collins <rbtcoll...@hp.com>
Distinguished Technologist
HP Converged Cloud

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to