On Mar 16, 2015, at 10:08 AM, John Garbutt <j...@johngarbutt.com> wrote: > >> Drop of /v1.1 ? >> --------------- >> >> Only new deploys are really going to base off of our in tree >> config. I'm not convinced that we want to encourage people setting up >> new /v1.1 endpoint in tree. >> >> I'm not convinced there is a deprecation path here because the ones I >> could imagine would involve people changing their paste.ini to include >> a deprecation checking piece of code. >> >> Honestly, I don't care strongly either way on this one. It's cruft, >> but not dangerous cruft (unlike v3). > > +1 > > Lets drop the cruft now. People who feel they need it can add it back.
Agreed on this. The less cruft we carry, the better. -- Ed Leafe
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
