On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote: > What about this instead? > > POST /v2.0/subnets > > { > 'network_id': 'meh', > 'gateway_ip_template': '*.*.*.1' > 'prefix_len': 24, > 'pool_id': 'some_pool' > } > > At least that way it's clear the gateway attribute is not an IP, but a > template/string instead?
I thought about doing *s but in the world of Classless Inter-Domain Routing where not all networks are /24, /16, or /8 it seemed a bit imprecise. But, maybe that doesn't matter. I think the more important difference with your proposal here is that it is passed as a new attribute called 'gateway_ip_template'. I don't think that attribute would ever be sent back to the user. Is it ok to have write-only attributes? Is everyone comfortable with that? Carl __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev