I disagree with your assertion that NetApp has ignored this for a year and we are being inconsiderate of the community. The specific drivers (FC) we are discussing were added in the Kilo-1 period, so since Dec. and are net new drivers. All other NetApp drivers have had corresponding CI in place and operational.
-----Original Message----- From: Mike Perez [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 1:03 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI) On 13:15 Mon 23 Mar , ClaytonLuce, Timothy wrote: > Mike, > > Did not see a response to this request. Please respond, we can discuss in > the Cinder Core meeting this week. Which request? I already responded to your message: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-March/059518.html I responded to Huawei here: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-March/059561.html I've already responded to folks about extension: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-March/059508.html You either are reporting and show a history of being STABLE from now to RC or your driver will not be readded. No discussion necessary. I will be removing the agenda items for discussion on extensions. Three agenda items being added to purely discuss the failures of companies actually making OpenStack a priority for over a year is very inconsiderate of the communities time. -- Mike Perez __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
