Dean Troyer wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:47 AM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org > <mailto:thie...@openstack.org>> wrote: > > One area where we could work to remove noise would be to move new core > reviewers nomination/suggestion threads out of the ML. They are mostly > useless IMHO (only +1s), and PTLs are empowered to make the call anyway. > > That's one area where the PTL could move to "ask for forgiveness" model. > If we really want a feedback mechanism, we could look for a way to move > that to Gerrit or some other lightweight voting tool. > > > Team meetings would also be a good public place to publicly affirm those > nominations. Not everyone interested may be there but it's a logged > public place to accumulate +1s.
That's a good idea. Now how to communicate that... Should we jump on the next thread about core-reviewer nomination and derail it ? Should we (gasp) start a new thread to discuss that precise idea ? In all cases, we may need some "openstack-dev sanity police" that jumps on inadequate threads to keep them at an acceptable level. I did it for some time for support questions, Anita did some as well for review beggars... Volunteers welcome :) -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
