Dell - Internal Use - Confidential The link from cinder page to Cinder review inbox (https://review.openstack.org/#/dashboard/) from https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder#Resources is empty.
Link to bugs does work. -----Original Message----- From: Mike Perez [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 3:49 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder Review Inbox Was RE: Cinder Third-Party CI: what next? (was Re: [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no voting CI)) On 19:38 Tue 24 Mar , Asselin, Ramy wrote: > Changing the topic. > > Mike Perez did include a Cinder Review Inbox link on the main Cinder > Wiki page. > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder#Resources > > Not sure how many people/cores use that link but that could be a step > towards what you're asking for. > The query should probably be proposed to > http://git.openstack.org/cgit/stackforge/gerrit-dash-creator/tree/dash > boards > > Ramy > > >> From: Rochelle Grober [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 12:02 PM >> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Cinder Third-Party CI: what next? (was >> Re: [cinder] Request exemption for removal of NetApp FC drivers (no >> voting CI)) >> >> One other item I'd like to bring up. >> >> While Nova and Neutron are well distributed around the globe and have Core >> Reviewers on IRC in the Asia daytime, some other projects are not so well >> distributed as yet. A problem I noticed a number of times is that an Asia >> based developer will post to the mailing list to get some attention for >> his/her patch. This is frowned upon in the community, but when there are few >> to no Core Reviewers in IRC, getting that first core review can be >> difficult. Emailing the PTL is something I'm sure the PTLs would like to >> limit as they are already swamped. So, how do we get timely first core >> review of patches in areas of the world where Core presence in IRC is slim >> to none? >> >> I can think of a few options but they don't seem great: >> >> * A filter for dashboards that flags reviews with multiple +1s and no core >> along with a commitment of the Core team to perform a review within x number >> of days >> >> * A separate mailing list for project review requests >> >> * Somehow queueing requests in the IRC channel so that offline developers >> can easily find review requests when looking at channel logs >> >> * ??? >> >> Solving this issue could help not just Third Party developers, but all of >> OpenStack and make the community more inviting to Asian and Australian (and >> maybe European and African) developers. >> >> --Rocky Yes thanks Ramy. That's exactly what this dashboard helps with and has existed since January. I brought it up at the Cinder midcycle meetup, multiple times in meetings, reviewathons, etc. I was letting it sit and have people try it out before proposing to see if anyone had feedback. Since it has been sitting for a while without feedback, I'll go ahead and propose it. -- Mike Perez __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
