On 3/25/15, 3:21 PM, "Sean Dague" <s...@dague.net> wrote:
>On 03/25/2015 09:03 AM, Gary Kotton wrote: >> >> From: Jordan Pittier <jordan.pitt...@scality.com >> <mailto:jordan.pitt...@scality.com>> >> Reply-To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> >> Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 at 1:47 PM >> To: OpenStack List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] CI report formatting (citrix / >> hyperv / vmware ) >> >> Hi >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Sean Dague <s...@dague.net >> <mailto:s...@dague.net>> wrote: >> >> Currently Citrix, HyperV, and VMWare CI systems reporting on Nova >> patches have a different formatting than the standard that Jenkins >>and >> other systems are using: >> >> * test-name-no-spaces >>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__link.to_result&d=AwIF >>aQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=VlZxHpZBmzzkWT5jqz9JYB >>k8YTeq9N3-diTlNj4GyNc&m=WR2WbwJKtngJUjJEo4yFahEnv7RtC3NDaDsZFuzSukw&s=2Jr >>ZtoZF3o4ThkkR34bJH77FMeEorM65K2FQR9pKSuM&e= >> >><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__link.to_result&d=AwM >>FaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=VlZxHpZBmzzkWT5jqz9JY >>Bk8YTeq9N3-diTlNj4GyNc&m=EtHYlIXfK33bYsGf2k8XbFtgWlkcm_VdZCrFHTLEdiE&s=5S >>S-txUrD3o8KS3QIaCL3XMBbeCYK5CjmzmuxDda7Oc&e=> >> : [SUCCESS|FAILURE] some >> comment about the test >> >> I don't want to talk for Citrix, HyperV or VMWare but the "standard" >> only work if you use Zuul in your CI. I am using a setup based on a >> Jenkins plugin called gerrit-trigger and there's no way to format the >> message the way it's expected... >> >> >> This means these systems don't show up in the CI rollup block - >> >>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__dl.dropbox.com_u_6514 >>884_screenshot-5F158.png&d=AwIFaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNt >>Xt-uEs&r=VlZxHpZBmzzkWT5jqz9JYBk8YTeq9N3-diTlNj4GyNc&m=WR2WbwJKtngJUjJEo4 >>yFahEnv7RtC3NDaDsZFuzSukw&s=47UEXfmar4lGrIce8bEgHwvws7Lw0DPGWdEzPSDDAXQ&e >>= >> >><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__dl.dropbox.com_u_651 >>4884_screenshot-5F158.png&d=AwMFaQ&c=Sqcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMN >>tXt-uEs&r=VlZxHpZBmzzkWT5jqz9JYBk8YTeq9N3-diTlNj4GyNc&m=EtHYlIXfK33bYsGf2 >>k8XbFtgWlkcm_VdZCrFHTLEdiE&s=nIjYwznh1_8aVBSz-XVEJrpNaMsDfqyekOQ2IhiHTo8& >>e=> >> >> >> Current the Vmware CI will vote +1 iff the patch has passed on the CI. >> We can investigate adding this to the CI rollup block. >> >> >> >> I'd really like that to change. The CI rollup block has been >>extremely >> useful in getting the test results of a patch above the fold, and >>the >> ability to dig into them clearly. I feel like if any CI system isn't >> reporting in standard format that's parsible by that, we should >>probably >> turn it off. >> >> >> I do not think that we should turn this off. They have value. It would >> be nice if things were all of the same format, which I guess that this >> is the intension of the mail. Lets all try and make an effort to work >> towards this goal. > >Right, honestly, I don't want these turned off, I want them reporting in >a more standard format. But I do think if they don't report in a >standard format it will cause problems and add to them being ignored. Vmware Nova CI has been updated. Please see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167713/ as an example. > > -Sean > >-- >Sean Dague >https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__dague.net&d=AwIFaQ&c=S >qcl0Ez6M0X8aeM67LKIiDJAXVeAw-YihVMNtXt-uEs&r=VlZxHpZBmzzkWT5jqz9JYBk8YTeq9 >N3-diTlNj4GyNc&m=WR2WbwJKtngJUjJEo4yFahEnv7RtC3NDaDsZFuzSukw&s=xIhHqi-2NYa >hyaoPL1ItksCYtWuk6fTgcobpaGGpjUQ&e= > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
