I see this spec has been merged however can anyone point out if this will make it into final Kilo release?
Thanks, Dani On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Tim Bell <tim.b...@cern.ch> wrote: > Are we yet at the point in the New Year to register requests for > exceptions ? > > > > There is strong interest from CERN and Yahoo! In this feature and there > are many +1s and no unaddressed -1s. > > > > Thanks for consideration, > > > > Tim > > > > > Joe wrote > > > …. > > > > > >Nova's spec deadline has passed, but I think this is a good candidate for > an exception. We will announce the process for asking for a formal spec > exception shortly after new years. > > > > > > > *From:* Tim Bell [mailto:tim.b...@cern.ch] > *Sent:* 23 December 2014 19:02 > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical Multitenancy > > > > Joe, > > > > Thanks… there seems to be good agreement on the spec and the matching > implementation is well advanced with BARC so the risk is not too high. > > > > Launching HMT with quota in Nova in the same release cycle would also > provide a more complete end user experience. > > > > For CERN, this functionality is very interesting as it allows the central > cloud providers to delegate the allocation of quotas to the LHC > experiments. Thus, from a central perspective, we are able to allocate N > thousand cores to an experiment and delegate their resource co-ordinator to > prioritise the work within the experiment. Currently, we have many manual > helpdesk tickets with significant latency to adjust the quotas. > > > > Tim > > > > *From:* Joe Gordon [mailto:joe.gord...@gmail.com <joe.gord...@gmail.com>] > *Sent:* 23 December 2014 17:35 > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List > *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical Multitenancy > > > > > On Dec 23, 2014 12:26 AM, "Tim Bell" <tim.b...@cern.ch> wrote: > > > > > > > > It would be great if we can get approval for the Hierachical Quota > handling in Nova too (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/129420/). > > Nova's spec deadline has passed, but I think this is a good candidate for > an exception. We will announce the process for asking for a formal spec > exception shortly after new years. > > > > > > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > From: Morgan Fainberg [mailto:morgan.fainb...@gmail.com] > > Sent: 23 December 2014 01:22 > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Hierarchical Multitenancy > > > > > > > > Hi Raildo, > > > > > > > > Thanks for putting this post together. I really appreciate all the work > you guys have done (and continue to do) to get the Hierarchical > Mulittenancy code into Keystone. It’s great to have the base implementation > merged into Keystone for the K1 milestone. I look forward to seeing the > rest of the development land during the rest of this cycle and what the > other OpenStack projects build around the HMT functionality. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Morgan > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> On Dec 22, 2014, at 1:49 PM, Raildo Mascena <rail...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> Hello folks, My team and I developed the Hierarchical Multitenancy > concept for Keystone in Kilo-1 but What is Hierarchical Multitenancy? What > have we implemented? What are the next steps for kilo? > >> > >> To answers these questions, I created a blog post > http://raildo.me/hierarchical-multitenancy-in-openstack/ > >> > >> > >> > >> Any question, I'm available. > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Raildo Mascena > >> > >> Software Engineer. > >> > >> Bachelor of Computer Science. > >> > >> Distributed Systems Laboratory > >> Federal University of Campina Grande > >> Campina Grande, PB - Brazil > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OpenStack-dev mailing list > >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenStack-dev mailing list > > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
