On 1 April 2015 at 12:52, Thierry Carrez <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Yes, these are not orthogonal ideas. The question should be rephrased to > > 'which description do you identify the most with: core > > developer/reviewer or maintainer?' > > - Some people are core reviewers and maintainers (or "drivers", to reuse > the openstack terminology we already have for that) > - Some people are core reviewers only (because they can't commit 90% of > their work time to work on project priorities) > - Some people are maintainers/drivers only (because their project duties > don't give them enough time to also do reviewing) > - Some people are casual developers / reviewers (because they can't > spend more than 30% of their day on project stuff) > > All those people are valuable. Simply renaming "core reviewers" to > "maintainers" (creating a single super-developer class) just excludes > valuable people. > Ok, I'd misunderstood the proposal further up the thread when I replied before. This sounds eminently sensible. There's certainly no hard at all in recognising large contributions other than reviews, and bug triage is almost becoming as large a job at various points in the cycle. -- Duncan Thomas
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
