On 02/04/15 06:19 -0400, Sean Dague wrote:
On 04/02/2015 05:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:Michael Still wrote:Actually, for some projects the +1 is part of a public voting process and therefore required.Could that "public voting process" happen somewhere else ? Like at an IRC meeting ?For global teams there is no IRC meeting that lets everyone have a voice.
Also, FWIW, I don't mind knowing when teams grow!
Also, did anyone ever vote -1 ?Yes, there was a Cinder vote that had -1s (for invalid reasons) it was useful to have that in the open because it straightened out some culture issues. Also I failed to gather the requisite 5 +1s the first time I was proposed for nova-core. While embarrassing, I got over it. I do get that made a lot of people more heavily straw poll first to avoid those kinds of situations.
And I believe there was a case in Neutron too.
(FWIW originally we used lazy consensus -- PTL proposes, and approval is automatic after a while unless someone *opposes*. Not sure when +1s or public voting was added as a requirement).No idea myself. But it's been here since I started participating in the project in March 2012. Requiring a [core] tag for these so people can get rid of them if they don't care seems fair.
+1 Flavio -- @flaper87 Flavio Percoco
pgpetEp2QUIyU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
