+1. I added a suggestion for a container networking suggestion to the etherpad for neutron. It would be sad if the container solution built yet another overlay on top of the Neutron networks with yet another network management workflow. By the time the packets are traveling across the wires, it would be nice not to have double encapsulation from completely different systems.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 04/02/2015 12:36 PM, Adrian Otto wrote: > > What to expect in the Liberty release cycle: > > > ... > > * Overlay networking > ... > > This is totally unrelated to your PTL email, but on this point, I'd be > curious what the Magnum team thinks of this proposal: > > http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2015-March/052663.html > > It's a proposed (and now merged) design for how containers that live > inside OpenStack managed VMs can be natively connected to virtual > networks managed by Neutron. There's some parts of the process that are > handled by the container orchestration system being used. > > -- > Russell Bryant > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Kevin Benton
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
