Jay, Thanks for staying on top of updating & opening Liberty specs, and for all your help with specs during Kilo!
-Deva On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 10:40 AM Jay Faulkner <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Just a note to let you know Liberty specs are open for Ironic. > > Template Changes > ———————— > There are two minor changes to the spec template for Liberty: > - State Machine Impact is now a full section, where changes to Ironic’s > State Machine should be called out. > - In the REST API Impact section, submitters should indicate if the > microversion should be incremented as part of the change. > > > Kilo Specs > ————— > If you had a spec approved for Kilo that didn’t get implemented, please > put in a merge request moving the spec from kilo-archive/ to liberty/, and > ensure your spec complies with the new template by adding a State Machine > Impact section and indicating any microversion version changes needed in > the REST API Impact section. > > > Backlog Specs > ——————— > As a reminder; Ironic does still employ a spec backlog for desired > features that aren’t ready for implementation due to time, priority, or > dependencies. If there are any specs currently in the backlog you’d like to > propose for Liberty, please move it from backlog/ to liberty/ and add the > additional required information for a full spec. > > > Thanks to everyone for a successful Kilo cycle, and I’m looking forward to > seeing the new slate of ideas for Liberty. > > > - > Jay Faulkner > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
