On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo < mangel...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Why would operators install from devstack? that’s not going to be the case. > If they do they need more help than we can give... > I believe we should have both LB & OVS well tested, if LB is a good option > for > some operators willing to migrate from nova, that’s great, let’s make sure > LB > is perfectly tested upstream. > +1 > But by doing such change we can’t let OVS code rot and we would be > neglecting > a big customer base which is now making use of the openvswitch mechanism. > (may be I’m miss understanding the scope of the change). > Changing DevStack's default doesn't remove anything OVS-related, nor does it by itself remove any OVS jobs. It gives everyone who is happy with nova-net (or more correctly doesn't think about it) a new default that changes their experience the least for when nova-net disappears. dt -- Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
