Hi Emilien, On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 10:52 -0400, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > On 04/16/2015 02:32 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > > > > > On 04/16/2015 02:23 PM, Richard Raseley wrote: > >> Emilien Macchi wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I sent a patch to openstack/governance to move our project under the big > >>> tent, and it came up [1] that we should decide of a project name and be > >>> careful about trademarks issues with Puppet name. > >>> > >>> I would like to hear from Puppetlabs if there is any issue to use Puppet > >>> in the project title; also, I open a new etherpad so people can suggest > >>> some names: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-naming > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/172112/1/reference/projects.yaml,cm > >> > >> Emilien, > >> > >> I went ahead and had a discussion with Puppet's legal team on this > >> issue. Unfortunately at this time we are unable to sanction the use of > >> Puppet's name or registered trademarks as part of the project's name. > >> > >> To be clear, this decision is in no way indicative of Puppet not feeling > >> the project is 'worthy' or 'high quality' (in fact the opposite is > >> true), but rather is a purely defensive decision. > >> > >> We are in the process of reevaluating our usage guidelines, but there is > >> no firm timetable as of this moment. > > > > I guess our best option is to choose a name without Puppet in the title. > > We will proceed to a vote after all proposals on the etherpad. > > While we hear from Puppetlabs about the trademark potential issue, I > would like to run a vote for a name that does not contain `Puppet`, so > we can go ahead on the governance thing. > I took all proposals on the etherpad [1] and created a poll that will > close on next Tuesday 3pm, just before our weekly meeting so we will > make it official. > > Anyone is welcome to vote: > http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/vote.pl?id=E_6c81ad92b71422d6&akey=f2e85294f17caa9a > > Any feedback on the vote itself is also welcome. > > Thanks, > > [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-naming
Another idea on this ... a number of OpenStack projects have purely descriptive names (and no 'service' attribute), for example Infrastructure, Documentation, Security, Quality Assurance, and Release Cycle Management. Simply calling the project "OpenStack Puppet Modules" would follow that pattern, and a straightforward descriptive use of the Puppet name may not be objectionable. Mark. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
