On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 15:02 +0000, Amrith Kumar wrote: > > I would support changes to both reviewstats and stackalytics to do the > following. > > 1. recognizes and gives credit to '0' comments > 2. identifies recheck, reverify and similar directives to the CI > system and flag them appropriately, potentially as not being reviews > but something else.
I'm intrigued by this request. In the Quarterly Activity Reports[1] I am more interested in time to merge (the time for a changeset to go from first proposal to merged), time to respond (for human interations in comments) and iterations (how many patchsets in a changeset). I wonder if I should expand the scope of the reports. Can you elaborate why you are interested in this sort of count? /stef [1] http://superuser.openstack.org/articles/openstack-breaks-a-new-record-for-active-contributors [1] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/activity-board/plain/reports/2015-q1/pdf/2015-q1_OpenStack_report.pdf __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
