> > If we've reached the point where we're arguing about naming, dos this mean >> we've built consensus on the "yes, it makes sense for these to live under >> Neutron" argument? >> > > I think we are in agreement that these projects need to find a more obvious home, they feel somewhat orphan otherwise. Most of them are extensions or plugins to Neutron and since they cannot stand alone, it makes sense to have them associated with it. As far as I am concerned I think the matter is about the inclusion methodology as well as the timing.
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev