> If we've reached the point where we're arguing about naming, dos this mean
>> we've built consensus on the "yes, it makes sense for these to live under
>> Neutron" argument?
I think we are in agreement that these projects need to find a more obvious
home, they feel somewhat orphan otherwise. Most of them are extensions or
plugins to Neutron and since they cannot stand alone, it makes sense to
have them associated with it. As far as I am concerned I think the matter
is about the inclusion methodology as well as the timing.

OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Reply via email to