Hi,
I was recently hit with a couple of Jenkins -1 votes due to underlying failures
in the test framework which never even completed the installation of the test
framework.
In circumstances like this I wonder if it might make sense to have Jenkins
"abstain" rather than mark it -1. We could then have a job that went around and
re-ran Jenkins tests for cases where it "abstained" previously.
I think it would make sense for Jenkins to only vote -1 if it actually ran the
tests and hit failures (as opposed to failing to run the test at all).
Chris
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
