Geoff,

Would the generic parts of your "reseller" solution by contributed to the 
upstream projects (e.g. glance, horizon, ceilometer) ? It would be good to get 
the core components understanding hierarchical multitenancy for all the use 
cases.

The nova quota work is being submitted upstream for Liberty by Sajeesh 
(https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api)

The cinder quota proposal is also underway 
(https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/cinder-nested-quota-driver)

Tim

From: Geoff Arnold [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 28 April 2015 08:11
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy and 
Glance?

Use cases:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HierarchicalMultitenancy

Blueprints:
(Kilo):
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/hierarchical-multitenancy
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/reseller
(Liberty):
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multiple-level-user-quota-management
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nested-quota-driver-api
(Pending):
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/hierarchical-projects
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/inherited-roles

As for adoption, it's hard to say. The HMT work in Keystone was a necessary 
starting point, but in order to create a complete solution we really need the 
corresponding changes in Nova (quotas), Glance (resource visibility), Horizon 
(UI scoping), and probably Ceilometer (aggregated queries). We (Cisco) are 
planning to kick off a Stackforge project to knit all of these things together 
into a complete "reseller" federation system. I'm assuming that there will be 
other system-level compositions of the various pieces.

Geoff

On Apr 27, 2015, at 9:48 PM, Tripp, Travis S 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Geoff,

Getting a spec on HMT would be helpful, as Nikhil mentioned.

As a general question, what it the current adoption of domains / vs
hierarchical projects? Is there a wiki or something that highlights what
the desired path forward is with regard to domains?

Thanks,
Travis

On 4/27/15, 7:16 PM, "Geoff Arnold" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


Good points. I¹ll add some details. I¹m sure the Reseller guys will have
some comments.

Geoff


On Apr 27, 2015, at 3:32 PM, Nikhil Komawar
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Thanks Geoff. Added some notes and questions.

-Nikhil

________________________________________
From: Geoff Arnold <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2015 5:50 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Glance] Hierarchical multitenancy
and       Glance?

In preparation for Vancouver, I¹ve been looking for blueprints and
design summit discussions involving the application of the Keystone
hierarchical multitenancy work to other OpenStack projects. One obvious
candidate is Glance, where, for example, we might want domain-local
resource visibility as a default. Despite my searches, I wasn¹t able to
find anything. Did I miss something obvious?

I¹ve added a paragraph to
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-glance-summit-topics to make
sure it doesn¹t get overlooked.

Cheers,

Geoff

_________________________________________________________________________
_
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


_________________________________________________________________________
_
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe<mailto:[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to