+1 --Adam
https://keybase.io/rm_you From: Doug Wiegley <doug...@parksidesoftware.com<mailto:doug...@parksidesoftware.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Friday, May 1, 2015 at 11:19 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Joining Neutron under the big tent +1 Governance patch filed: https://review.openstack.org/179417 Thanks, doug On May 1, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Jorge Miramontes <jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com<mailto:jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com>> wrote: Good stuff. Thanks everyone for your hard work on getting Octavia to this point! Cheers, --Jorge From: Brandon Logan <brandon.lo...@rackspace.com<mailto:brandon.lo...@rackspace.com>> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Date: Friday, May 1, 2015 at 10:20 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Joining Neutron under the big tent +1 from me ________________________________ From: Kyle Mestery <mest...@mestery.com<mailto:mest...@mestery.com>> Sent: Friday, May 1, 2015 8:53 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [octavia] Joining Neutron under the big tent On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Eichberger, German <german.eichber...@hp.com<mailto:german.eichber...@hp.com>> wrote: Hi, I am proposing that Octavia is joining the Networking program as a project under the Services area. Octavia is the open scalable reference implementation for Neutron LBaaS V2 and has always seen itself as part of the networking program. We have adopted most governance rules from the Networking program, sharing the same build structure, and are organized like an OpenDStack project. This sounds fine to me German. To proceed here, propose something similar to what Russell has proposed for OVN here [1], and ping me on IRC with the review so I can ack it. The TC can then approve it at a future meeting. Thanks! Kyle [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/175954/ Thanks, German __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org>?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev