On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Ruby Loo <rlooya...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Maybe the question is better posed to those folks -- was it useful or not? > And if not, why? Because the date/time still didn't work, or because not > enough (or the right persons) weren't there so their issues of interest > weren't discussed, or they wouldn't have attended anyway, or ? And if it > was useful, for how many was it useful? (Devananda's poll will capture some > of that info.) > I found it useful - it's nice to be awake at meeting time :) There's certainly a subset of the team that I never overlap with now, which is a shame, but timezones present challenges for a geographically dispersed team. Previously the meeting was at 4:30am (or 5:30am depending upon daylight savings), which was quite hard, but I did make it most weeks. The new timeslot of 2:30am/pm (3:30am/pm) is certainly only achievable for me every other week (no surprises for guessing which one :) I think it's great that we try and accommodate contributors from all around the globe! Michael... -- Michael Davies mich...@the-davies.net Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev