I just did an abandon run for specs that meet this criteria and haven't been touched since March. Once again, this isn't a kiss of death, just an attempt at review backlog hygiene.
Cheers, Michael On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:26 AM, John Garbutt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Monday, May 4, 2015, Michael Still <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I just wanted to let people know that I am going through abandoning >> old specs for Nova at the moment. The criteria I am using is: >> >> - spec targets kilo >> - no review comments or other activity since January or February >> >> I think its worth reinforcing that an abandon isn't a -2... An upload >> of a new version of the spec will re-open reviews on it. Here's the >> message I've been using while abandoning: >> >> "Please update this spec for Liberty if you're still interested in >> pursuing it." >> > > Thanks, I already did the ones not touched this year. Makes sense to take > that a bit further. > > We should probably automate this to get parity with code patches, or > something similar at least? > > Thanks, > John > >> >> -- >> Rackspace Australia >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Rackspace Australia __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
