On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Mathieu Gagné <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2015-05-21 4:18 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: > >>> > >> > >> I guess it's for the reason I mentioned above: > >> > >> To not break all OpenStack installations on Earth running with default > >> config values. > >> > > > > So that's not breaking *upgrades* of all OpenStack installations with > > default config values, which is a slightly different thing. > > > > Yes it will. Try to change instance_template_name and manage existing > instances. You won't be able. > > The above scenario is the same as upgrading OpenStack Nova and having > instance_template_name changes its default value. Unless someone patches > Nova to use the instance UUID instead of its name to find it in libvirt. > Novice question: For each instance I believe we store the name (instance-0000xx) and uuid in the DB ? If yes, then can't nova lookup using uuid given the name or vice versa since the mapping to name - uuid is possible from DB ? > > -- > Mathieu > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
