Hi Tim, Maybe you should consider Monasca[1], Monitoring At Scale solution for OpenStack, or, at least, a few concepts of it.
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Monasca []s Henrique Truta Em ter, 26 de mai de 2015 às 14:49, Tim Bell <tim.b...@cern.ch> escreveu: > > > We had a good discussion at the summit regarding ceilometer scaling. > Julien has written up some of the items discussed in > https://julien.danjou.info/blog/2015/openstack-summit-liberty-vancouver-ceilometer-gnocchi > and there is work ongoing in the storage area for scalable storage of > ceilometer data using gnocchi. > > > > I’d like community input on the other scalability concern raised during > the event, namely the load on other services when ceilometer is enabled. > From the blog, “Ceilometer hits various endpoints in OpenStack that are > poorly designed, and hitting those endpoints of Nova or other components > triggers a lot of load on the platform.”. > > > > I would welcome suggestions on how to identify the potential changes in > the OpenStack projects and improve the operator experience when deploying > metering. > > > > Tim > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
