On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Duncan Thomas <duncan.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 28 May 2015 at 13:03, Deepak Shetty <dpkshe...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Isn't this similar to what cinder transfer-* cmds are for ? Ability to >> transfer cinder volume across tenants >> So Manila should be implementing the transfer-* cmds, after which >> admin/user can create a clone >> then initiate a transfer to a diff tenant ? >> >> > Cinder doesn't seem to have any concept analogous to a share network from > what I can see; the cinder transfer commands are for moving a volume > between tenants, which is a different thing, I think. > Yes, cinder doesn't have any eq of share network. But my comment was from the functionality perpsective. In cinder transfer-* commands are used to transfer ownership of volumes across tenants. IIUC the ability in Manila to create a share from snapshot and have that share in a different share network is eq to creating a share from a snapshot for a different tenant, no ? Share networks are typically 1-1 with tenant network AFAIK, correct me if i am wrong > > -- > Duncan Thomas > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
