Hi Kyle, > -----Original Message----- > From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mest...@mestery.com] > Sent: June 15, 2015 04:26 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] VLAN-aware VMs meeting > > On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 8:51 AM, Ildikó Váncsa <ildiko.van...@ericsson.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Since we reopened the review for this blueprint we’ve got a > large number of comments. It can be clearly seen that the original proposal > has to be changed, although it still requires some discussion to define a > reasonable design that provides the desired feature and is aligned with the > architecture and guidelines of Neutron. In order to speed up the process to > fit into the Liberty timeframe, we would like to have a discussion about this. > The goal is to discuss the alternatives we have, decide which to go on with > and sort out the possible issues. After this discussion the blueprint will be > updated with the desired solution. > > > > I would like to propose a time slot for _next Tuesday (06. 16.), > 17:00UTC – 18:00UTC_. I would like to have the discussion on the > #openstack-neutron channel, that gives a chance to guys who might be > interested, but missed this mail to attend. I tried to check the slot, but > please > let me know if it collides with any Neutron related meeting. > > > > > This looks to be fine. I would suggest that it may make more sense to have it > in an #openstack-meeting channel, though we can certainly do a free-form > chat in #openstack-neutron as well. I think the desired end-goal here should > be to figure out any remaining nits that are being discussed on the spec so > we can move forward in Liberty. >
I wasn’t sure that it is a good idea to bring an unscheduled meeting to the meeting channels. Is it acceptable to hold an ad-hoc meeting there or does it have to be registered somewhere even if it's one occasion? As much as I saw the #openstack-meeting-4 channel is available although the list of meetings and the .ical file is not in sync, it's not taken in either. Should we try it there? I agree with the desired outcome, so that we can start the implementation as soon as possible. I will try to send out an agenda before the meeting with the points that we should discuss. Thanks and Best Regards, Ildikó > > Thanks, > > Kyle > > > > > > > Thanks and Best Regards, > > Ildikó > > > _______________________________________________ > ___________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev- > requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack- > dev > > > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
