Some reasons of having complementary projects in Stackalytics: * to compare efforts in other communities with OpenStack - just to feed curiosity on what is larger OpenStack or Kubernetes? * to light interest to contribute to projects that OpenStack depends on, like OVS and Ansible. * to keep an eye on commercial interest and know who is sponsoring near-by technologies.
I agree that adding complementary projects was an authoritarian decision and ready to remove them in the community version if TC decides so. Thanks, Ilya 2015-06-19 10:48 GMT+03:00 Thierry Carrez <[email protected]>: > Paul Belanger wrote: > > I am wondering the reason for the complementary projects listing[1] in > > Stackalytics? Specifically, why does stackalytics-processor import > > docker and cloudfoundry projects into the stats? > > > > [1] http://stackalytics.com/?project_type=complementary&metric=commits > > It's not a community decision. I'd say it is an editorial decision of > the current owner of the project and website. While we are trying to > move this project under the Infra project team and the Technical > Committee oversight, it is currently still a Stackforge project owned by > Mirantis. > > Personally if we were to move it under Infra I would (1) remove the > complementary projects and (2) make sure that whoever wants to reuse > stackalytics code to track Docker / CloudFoundry activity can easily do so. > > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
