Hmm, as it is a change that affects the user, in my opinion it is still an API change.
Have we decided about the client, whether the alarming module will have a separate client or we will keep the current ceilometer-client? I guess more the latter one at least as a starting point, I just wanted to double check. Ildikó Sent from my iPad > On 30 Jun 2015, at 14:18, Julien Danjou <jul...@danjou.info> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 30 2015, Ildikó Váncsa wrote: >> >> Will this be accessible in the same way as currently or it needs >> changes on client side? > > You may just need to pass more options to the client to force another > endpoint to be used when talking to the alarming part. > We could make this change in the client by default though. > > -- > Julien Danjou > # Free Software hacker > # http://julien.danjou.info __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev