On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:04 AM, Emmanuel Cazenave <[email protected]> wrote:
> My first approach was to use devstack/icehouse to install swift/icehouse, > devstack/juno for swift/juno, etc.... > This is the only approach that is sane... > I am now trying to use devstack/master in every cases because I need this > : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115307/ which allow not to install > nova+glance which I don't need at all, and whose installation takes a > really long time. > We would probably consider a backport of that to DevStack Juno, but Icehouse is effectively EOL and we will be removing that branch soon (days or weeks, not months). > Is my use case of installing older releases with devstack/master not > supported ? > No. Even on master you may have issues trying to run a early cycle project with a late-cycle DevStack. DevStack evolves to meet the needs of the projects as they develop. That Tempest fix is pretty straightforward, with only the one code block move not being a "skip this if project is not enabled" check. With Icehouse EOL, there will be no additional updates so maintaining that backport in a local private branch should not be a big deal. You will need that anyway to keep using icehouse after we remove that branch from the DevStack repo. dt -- Dean Troyer [email protected]
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
