Sean Dague wrote: > On 07/08/2015 12:51 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> Sean Dague wrote: >>> Personally, I'm running out of steam on tags for this cycle, but Zane >>> brought up a good point in the TC meeting yesterday, which was that "it >>> would be nice to have tags for criteria that we used to use for >>> integration requirements". I strongly agree with that perspective. >>> [...] >> >> Thanks for bringing that up. As mentioned at the TC meeting yesterday I >> plan to set up a small TC workgroup to aggressively look for missing >> tags and define them. Russell already signed up, and as all TC >> workgroups it can include non-TC members (it's actually a great way to >> do succession planning at the TC). >> >> I'm still stuck on (re)defining the release tags to match the Liberty >> release models, but I plan to start working on that soon after. >> >> Who is in? > > Happy to help. I think turning this into a WG probably spreads the load > around a bit to prevent burnout.
The WG is also about: * preparing tag submissions as a group rather than wait for an individual to care enough to propose one * pre-discussing issues at the WG level to remove load on the TC itself * having a more coherent vision overall The only reason we didn't do it before is that we already had a backlog of urgent tags to push. I think we are almost past that now and can spend more time designing the tag landscape. Personally I want to push "stability" tags that would define 3 levels of API/feature deprecation models for projects to commit to: 1- Will never ever deprecate an API or a feature ever, we are mature. 2- May remove APIs / features but will follow deprecation / removal N+2 rule, we are used in production but still developing. 3- May just remove anything anytime, we are very experimental. This is not a judgment call, every project team is free to select which model they commit to -- and I think it's VERY interesting information for our users, which was completely hidden below the binary "integrated release" (which had swift (1), nova (2) and ironic (3) at the same time). -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
