++! Per my understanding, the work, and therefore the risks, are fairly compartmentalized. The upside is this will pave the way for a much richer authorization management system.
Guang From: Adam Young [mailto:ayo...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 10:15 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Liberty SFE Request - Dynamic Policies On 07/03/2015 08:36 AM, Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz wrote: Hi Thierry, Thanks for clarifying. A Spec Freeze Exception is what I was supposed to ask for. Rectifying: On behalf of the team working on the Dynamic Policies subject, I would like to ask for a *Spec Freeze Exception* in Liberty for it. This one is an important lead in to a lot of other work. Getting just this in to Liberty allows us to focus the remainder of the work on Dynamic policy inside Keystone. Please approve. Thanks, Samuel de Medeiros Queiroz Thierry Carrez wrote: samuel wrote: [...] On behalf of the team working on the Dynamic Policies subject, I would like to ask for a Feature Freeze Exception in Liberty for it. Liberty Feature Freeze is on September 3rd, so I doubt you need a feature freeze exception at this time. I suspect that would be a spec freeze exception or some other Keystone-specific freeze exception ? https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/FeatureFreeze __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
