Fantastic, do we have some way to validate that the module was pulled in
properly as part of fuel-library CI?

On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:48 PM Alex Schultz <aschu...@mirantis.com> wrote:

> Hey All,
>
> I've figured it out without having to modify the fuel-main build code.
> I've updated the fuel-library spec with a build action that invokes the
> script to pull down external modules.  Please take some time to review the
> two reviews out there for this change to see if there are any issues with
> the way it is implemented.
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/202763/
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/202767/
>
> This is a first step towards being able to pull in unmodified external
> puppet modules.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Andrew Woodward <awoodw...@mirantis.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:24 PM Vladimir Kozhukalov <
>> vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Alex,
>>>
>>> Great that you did this. Now I think I can prepare fuel-main patch to
>>> invoke this script right before building fuel-library package. I'll add you
>>> to review it. Is it ok if I do this monday morning?
>>>
>>
>> Keep in minde we agreeded to a deadline to get this sorted and in shape
>> to land by EOD monday or we will have to retain the old, and crappy fork
>> method. If possible please work out how this needs to work as early as
>> possible so Alex can continue.
>>
>>
>>> Vladimir Kozhukalov
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Alex Schultz <aschu...@mirantis.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Vladimir,
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <
>>>> vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Alex,
>>>>>
>>>>> Gathering upstream modules certainly should be implemented as a
>>>>> separate script so as to make it possible to use it wherever we need this
>>>>> (tests, builds, etc.) According to builds there are two things
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) We have so called "perestroika" package build system (Dmitry
>>>>> Burmistrov is a main contributor here). By the end of next week we are
>>>>> going to switch building all the packages to "perestroika". And in order 
>>>>> to
>>>>> gather upstream modules right before building fuel-library package, we 
>>>>> need
>>>>> to change perestroika build scripts.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2) Currently we build packages using make system and you are right
>>>>> about the place where you need to make changes.
>>>>> https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-main/blob/master/packages/module.mk#L63-L82
>>>>> If you create shell script, I'll help you to add it to make code.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have updated my review[0] to extract the update logic to it's own
>>>> bash script that can be invoked by the build scripts.  Let me know what
>>>> would be the best way to wedge this in there.  I think for the
>>>> "perestroika" this would also be needed for the fuel-library build, so if
>>>> you point me at that I can see if I can help make that change as well.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>> [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/202763/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Vladimir Kozhukalov
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Aleksandr Didenko <
>>>>> adide...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe build_repo function is the best way to do this [0]. So for
>>>>>> fuel-library we'll need to run a shell script right from the repo before
>>>>>> 'touch $$@'. We can make it either conditional ( test -f
>>>>>> ./path/additional_build_script.sh && bash 
>>>>>> ./path/additional_build_script.sh
>>>>>> ) or as additional parameter to function and add it in fuel-library call 
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [0]
>>>>>> https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-main/blob/master/repos.mk#L16-L37
>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-main/blob/master/repos.mk#L45
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Alex Schultz <aschu...@mirantis.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hey Alex,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jul 17, 2015 4:32 AM, "Aleksandr Didenko" <adide...@mirantis.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Hi,
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > I think that we should provide a separate script that will fetch
>>>>>>> the upstream modules into fuel-library/deployment/puppet/ directory. It
>>>>>>> will allow us to have everything in a single place and use this script 
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> ISO build process and CI jobs.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Right. That is what I'm going for. The issue I need help with is the
>>>>>>> best way to execute this as part of the build process.  From what i
>>>>>>> understand of the build process is that we are using git archive for all
>>>>>>> pieces so I'm not sure how to wedge in an extra script execution to do 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> module fetch.  The creation of the script isn't the issue, the issue is 
>>>>>>> how
>>>>>>> can I properly run it as part of the build process.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > Regards,
>>>>>>> > Alex
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> -Alex
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Alex Schultz <
>>>>>>> aschu...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Hello everyone,
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> I have committed the initial configuration required to start
>>>>>>> leveraging librarian-puppet as part of the way we pull in upstream 
>>>>>>> puppet
>>>>>>> modules[0]. Additionally, I have also committed a change that would 
>>>>>>> pull in
>>>>>>> the openstack-ironic module[1].  The one piece that is missing from this
>>>>>>> being a complete solution is the ability to run librarian-puppet as 
>>>>>>> part of
>>>>>>> our build process for the fuel-library.  I've looked into the fuel-main
>>>>>>> build scripts and I think it's over my head to figure this out just by
>>>>>>> looking. Can anyone explain to me or assist me in how I could go about
>>>>>>> modifying the existing build system to be able to run librarian-puppet 
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> prepare the source for the package?  In my initial investigation, it 
>>>>>>> looks
>>>>>>> like it would be a modification of the fuel-main/packages/module.mk[3]
>>>>>>> file.  I basically need to do the prepare_library[3] function from the
>>>>>>> 202763 review[0] after we've pulled all the sources together to fetch 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> upstream modules.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Thanks,
>>>>>>> >> -Alex
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> [0] https://review.openstack.org/202763
>>>>>>> >> [1] https://review.openstack.org/202767
>>>>>>> >> [2]
>>>>>>> https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-main/blob/master/packages/module.mk#L63-L82
>>>>>>> >> [3]
>>>>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/202763/1/utils/jenkins/fuel_noop_tests.rb
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>> >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>>>>> >> Unsubscribe:
>>>>>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>>>>> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>>>>> > Unsubscribe:
>>>>>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>>>>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>>>>> Unsubscribe:
>>>>>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>>>> Unsubscribe:
>>>>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>>> Unsubscribe:
>>>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>>> Unsubscribe:
>>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________________________
>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>> --
>> --
>> Andrew Woodward
>> Mirantis
>> Fuel Community Ambassador
>> Ceph Community
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe:
>> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-- 

--

Andrew Woodward

Mirantis

Fuel Community Ambassador

Ceph Community
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to