On 20 July 2015 at 08:27, Matt Keenan <matt.kee...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 07/06/15 23:19, Ruby Loo wrote: > >> On 1 July 2015 at 08:25, Matt Keenan <matt.kee...@oracle.com >> <mailto:matt.kee...@oracle.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> In submitting my first ironic spec, I am following the process >> outlined at: >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Ironic/Specs_Process >> >> As of Kilo this suggests we also follow: >> >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-August/041960.html >> >> This indicates that once a spec is registered before submission of >> the spec text the registered spec needs to be given the ok. >> >> Quick discussion on IRC indicates that this was never adhered to. If >> it's not going to be adhered to then I'd suggest removing this >> reference from Specs_Process. >> >> cheers >> >> Matt >> >> >> Hi Matt, >> >> My interpretation of the email you referenced, was to help 'fast-track' >> two things: 1. new 'features' that didn't require a spec to be written >> and 2. new 'features' that are out of scope or something that just won't >> work for whatever reason. >> >> I believe it may be true (although I haven't read all the proposed >> specs) that no one has actually followed that process, but I don't know >> if that means we should not provide that as a choice. Are you >> interpreting it as 'You must follow this process' as opposed to 'You >> could choose to follow this process'? >> > > My interpretation was "You must follow this process", but if it's optional > then not an issue I guess. > > cheers > > Matt Thanks for the feedback Matt. I've updated the wiki so that it is clearer (I hope) that it is optional! --ruby
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev