We had that before and had very poor validation. Removing fuelmenu would make the experience quite manual and prone to errors.
This topic comes up once a year only from Fuel Python developers because they rarely use it and no dev cycles have been invested in improving it. The actual Fuel deployers use it and appreciate its validation and wish to extend it. I'd like to hear more feedback. On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > What do you think of getting rid of fuelmenu and substituting it with > thoroughly commented text file + some validation + vim? The major pro of > this is that text file is easier to extend and edit. Many people prefer vim > UX instead of wandering through the semi-graphical interface. And it is not > so hard to implement syntax and logic checking for the text file. > > Please give your opinions about this. > > Vladimir Kozhukalov > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
