From: Antoni Segura Puimedon 
<toni+openstac...@midokura.com<mailto:toni+openstac...@midokura.com>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Thursday, July 23, 2015 at 11:16 AM
To: Mohammad Banikazemi <m...@us.ibm.com<mailto:m...@us.ibm.com>>, "Steven Dake 
(stdake)" <std...@cisco.com<mailto:std...@cisco.com>>
Cc: Eran Gampel 
<eran.gam...@toganetworks.com<mailto:eran.gam...@toganetworks.com>>, "OpenStack 
Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>, 
Irena Berezovsky <ir...@midokura.com<mailto:ir...@midokura.com>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Kuryr][kolla] - Bringing Dockers 
networking to Neutron



On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, Mohammad Banikazemi 
<m...@us.ibm.com<mailto:m...@us.ibm.com>> wrote:

I let the creators of the project speak for themselves but here is my take on 
project Kuryr.

The goal is not to containerize Neutron or other OpenStack services. The main 
objective is to use Neutron as a networking backend option for Docker. The 
original proposal was to do so in the context of using containers (for 
different Neutron backends or vif types). While the main objective is 
fundamental to the project, the latter (use of containers in this particular 
way) seems to be a tactical choice we need to make. I see several different 
options available to achieve the same goal in this regard.

Thanks Mohammad. It is as you say, the goal of Kuryr to provide Docker with a 
new libnetwork remote
driver that is powered by Neutron, not a containerization of Neutron. Kuryr 
deployments as you point out,
may opt to point to a Neutron that is containerized, and for that I was looking 
at using Kolla. However,
that is just deployment and I consider it to be something up to the deployer 
(of course, we'll make Kuryr
containerizable and part of Kolla :-) ).

The design for interaction/configuration is not yet final, as I still have to 
push drafts for the blueprints and
get comments, but my initial idea is that you will configure docker to pass the 
configuration of which
device to take hold of for the overlay and where the neutron api are in the 
following way.


$ docker -d --kv-store=consul:localhost:8500 
--label=com.docker.network.driver.kuryr.bind_interface=eth0 
--label=com.docker.network.driver.kuryr.neutron_api=10.10.10.10
--label=com.docker.network.driver.kuryr.token=AUTH_tk713d067336d21348bcea1ab220965485

Why is a separate OpenStack project needed to contribute to libnetwork? I would 
think the Neutron community would follow the libnetwork contrib guidelines and 
submit the code.



Another possibility is that those values were passed as env variables or plain 
old configuration files.



Now, there is another aspect of using containers in the context of this project 
that is more interesting at least to me (and I do not know if others share this 
view or not) and that is the use of containers for providing network services 
that are not available through libnetwork as of now or in near future or ever. 
From the talks I have had with libnetwork developers the plan is to stay with 
the basic networking infrastructure and leave additional features to be 
developed by the community and to do so possibly by using what else, containers.

So take the current features available in libnetwork. You mainly get support 
for connectivity/isolation for multiple networks across multiple hosts. Now if 
you want to route between these networks, you have to devise a solution 
yourself. One possible solution would be having a router service in a container 
that gets connected to say two Docker networks. Whether the router service is 
implemented with the use of the current Neutron router services or by some 
other solutions is something to look into and discuss but this is a direction 
where I think Kuryr (did I spell it right? ;)) can and should contribute to.

You got that right. The idea is indeed to get the containers networked via 
libnetwork that, as you point out,
was left intentionally simple to be developed by the community; then we want to 
make make:

a) Kuryr get the containers to networks that have been pre-configured with 
advanced networking (lb, sec groups, etc).
Being able to perform changes on those networks via neutron after the fact as 
well. For example the container
orchestration software could create a Neutron network with a load balancer and 
a FIP, start containers on that network
and add them to the load balancer.
b) Via the usage of either docker labels on `docker run` make Kuryr implicitly 
set up Neutron networks/topologies.

Yup, you spelled it well. In Czech it is Kurýr, but for project purposes I 
dropped the "´"
Thanks a lot for contributing and I'm very happy to see that you got a very 
good sense for the direction we are taking.
I'm looking forward to meet you all in the community meetings!

Just my 2 cents on this topic.

Best,

Mohammad


[Inactive hide details for "Steven Dake (stdake)" ---07/23/2015 11:34:09 
AM---Gal, I’m not clear exactly what you plan to do wi]"Steven Dake (stdake)" 
---07/23/2015 11:34:09 AM---Gal, I’m not clear exactly what you plan to do with 
regards to building docker containers for Neutro

From: "Steven Dake (stdake)" <std...@cisco.com<mailto:std...@cisco.com>>
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>, 
Eran Gampel 
<eran.gam...@toganetworks.com<mailto:eran.gam...@toganetworks.com>>, Antoni 
Segura Puimedon <t...@midokura.com<mailto:t...@midokura.com>>, Irena Berezovsky 
<ir...@midokura.com<mailto:ir...@midokura.com>>, 
"gal.sa...@gmail.com<mailto:gal.sa...@gmail.com>" 
<gal.sa...@gmail.com<mailto:gal.sa...@gmail.com>>
Date: 07/23/2015 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Kuryr][kolla] - Bringing Dockers 
networking to Neutron

________________________________



Gal,

I’m not clear exactly what you plan to do with regards to building docker 
containers for Neutron, but the Kolla project has developed both linuxbridge 
and ovs agents as well as a complete running Neutron system inside container 
technology. We can launch it AIO with docker-compose, or alternatively it can 
be launched AIO or multinode with Ansible. Note we have a complete OpenStack 
implementation, not just Neutron.

We would welcome additional driver support using the standard OpenStack gerrit 
workflow.

https://github.com/stackforge/kolla/tree/master/docker/centos/binary/neutron

Note we are also in the process of adding build from source to our tree here:

https://github.com/stackforge/kolla/tree/master/docker/centos/source/neutron

For further background on Kolla, check out our wiki page:

https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Kolla

Hi Steven,

I'm glad to see you in this thread.

The goal of Kuryr is as pointed above by Mohammad (I added a bit to it). This 
other goal of getting additional
drivers for Neutron in Kolla is something that I've been looking at for a while 
and, while I can only speak for MidoNet,
I think it is something that all of the Neutron vendors should be looking to 
provide

I have been playing with kolla a bit and I have it on my list to have a Neutron 
container with the MidoNet plugin
and a nova compute container with the MidoNet Host Agent. I'll be reaching out 
on irc for help with that ;-)


Best regards,

Antoni Segura Puimedon



Best wishes,
-steve

From: Gal Sagie <gal.sa...@gmail.com<mailto:gal.sa...@gmail.com>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 9:28 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" 
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>, 
Eran Gampel 
<eran.gam...@toganetworks.com<mailto:eran.gam...@toganetworks.com>>, Antoni 
Segura Puimedon <t...@midokura.com<mailto:t...@midokura.com>>, Irena Berezovsky 
<ir...@midokura.com<mailto:ir...@midokura.com>>
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Kuryr] - Bringing Dockers networking to 
Neutron

Hello Everyone,

Project Kuryr is now officially part of Neutron's big tent.
Kuryr is aimed to be used as a generic docker remote driver that connects 
docker to Neutron API's
and provide containerised images for the common Neutron plugins.
We also plan on providing common additional networking services API's from 
other sub projects
in the Neutron big tent.

We hope to get everyone on board with this project and leverage this joint 
effort for the many different solutions out there (instead of everyone 
re-inventing the wheel for each different project).

We want to start doing a weekly IRC meeting to coordinate the different 
requierments and
tasks, so anyone that is interested to participate please share your time 
preference
and we will try to find the best time for the majority.

Remember we have people in Europe, Tokyo and US, so we won't be able to find 
time that fits
everyone.

The currently proposed time is Wedensday at 16:00 UTC

Please reply with your suggested time/day,
Hope to see you all, we have an interesting and important project ahead of us

Thanks
Gal.__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: 
openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe<http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to